Pedagogy

LEARNER-CENTERED PEDAGOGY

Our 3-pronged approach to digital learning and teaching harmonizes learner-centered pedagogy, open educational resources, and leveraged last mile technologies.

We offer the very best learning and enrichment services for educators to show digital capabilities. 

Harmonizing our 3-pronged approach

To achieve digital literacy requires several factors for digital learning. Experts, like ITU, agree that these factors include: connectivity, content, delivery, devices, and training. 

School e-Readiness 

National strategic plans by DEPEd, DICT, and other government role players are crucial. However, it is incumbent for every school to do their own digital learning needs assessment. Kaisipan provides a simple questionnaire that can help principals do a profile of their school e-readiness and help access training programs, identify free and open content, and leverage last km technologies.
VIEW OUR SERVICES


Driven by more knowledge and information online, the future will belong to those who are powerful, literate, curious learners. Educators who are learners themselves must be able to help students develop the skills, literacies, and attitudes to be powerful, self-organized learners. Several frameworks that underpin learner -centered pedagogy are summarized here.

Learning Sciences

Learning sciences is an interdisciplinary field that studies teaching and learning. Learning scientists study learning in a variety of settings – not only the more formal learning of school classrooms, but also the more informal learning that takes place at home, on the job, and among peers. The goal of the learning sciences is to better understand the cognitive and social processes that result in the most effective learning, and to use this knowledge to redesign classrooms and other learning environments so that people learn more deeply and more effectively…This new science is called the learning sciences because it is an interdisciplinary science; the collaboration among these disciplines has resulted in new ideas, new methodologies, and new ways of thinking about learning [bold by author] (Sawyer, 2008, p. 1).

Instructional Design

Greg Kearsley and Richard Culatta  created the instructional design site to support students, teachers, instructional designers, learning engineers, and anyone interested in creating more effective learning experiences. The site includes links to learning concepts, learning theories, and instructional design models.

TPACK

TPACK, developed by Mishra and Kohler (2006) is a useful model for educators as they begin to use digital tools and plan strategies to support teaching and learning. This model emphasizes starting with content (what you teach) and pedagogy (how you teach) as the basis for any technology that you plan to use in your classroom to enhance learning. 

Different models for Learning

Teachers and school administrators tried a mix and match of class instruction from handing out digital worksheets to holding class online at the same time every day. Hooker explained that t.he creation and execution of these new learning models require weighing the following factors: access to devices and the internet, socio-emotional state of students, teachers, and families, health concerns should the virus hit the school campus, physical space that considers social distancing, and expectations around testing.

Best Practices for Online Teaching

Ron Carranza, Andrew Salcido, and Jessica Cole offer a graphic that lists seven best practices for teaching online and digital learning. A full resolution pdf can be downloaded.

https://teachonline.asu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Best-Practices-for-Teaching-Online_083118.pdf

PRINCIPLES of EFFECTIVE LEARNING

Based on decades of research, on undergraduate education, Arthur W. Chickering and Zelda F. Gamson wrote the “Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education” in 1987 to improve teaching and learning. Chickering and Gamson published a book titled Applying the Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education (1991). 
https://citt.ufl.edu/resources/the-learning-process/designing-the-learning-experience/chickering-and-gamson/
The same principles maybe applied in the design and development of digital learning courses. Check out Mitchell's video explaining  how the principles of effective teaching are practiced in digital learning. 

Source: Valparaiso Institute for Teaching and Learning (VITAL)

Jen Gregory, Director of Instructional DesignNew Paragraph

Bloom's Cognitive and Digital Taxonomy

Most educators are familiar with Bloom’s Taxonomy, a model that classifies different levels of human cognition in thinking, learning, and understanding. See infographics on the right by Dr. Lilia R. Juele. Bloom's cognitive version has evolved into Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy (Infographic, on the left Credit: Ron Carranza.) This updated version aims to inform educators how to use digital tools to facilitate student learning experiences and outcomes. The use of Bloom's Digital Taxonomy is to focus our attention not on the tools themselves, but rather on how the tools can be used to transform learner's thinking at different levels. Check out this video resources from common sense.

 Building on Bloom's Taxonomy, later revised by Anderson and Krathwohl (2001), Andrew Churches provides a resource that contains cognitive elements as well as methods and tools.


Interested in a Bloom's Taxonomy Verbs Poster for Teachers?


Interested in the link between Bloom's Taxonomy and critical thinking?

Open edu offers this resource on Bloom's Critical Thinking and Across the curriculum.

Kaisipan couples our digital capabilities framework with the new world Kirkpatrick model. 


Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of Training Evaluation
Level 1: Reaction
The degree to which participants find the training favorable, engaging and relevant to their jobs
Level 2: Learning
The degree to which participants acquire the intended knowledge, skills, attitude, confidence and commitment based on their participation in the training
Level 3: Behavior
The degree to which participants apply what they learned during training when they are back on the job
Level 4: Results
The degree to which targeted outcomes occur as a result of the training and the support and accountability package


Share by: